Case Study. Champion Essay Example for Free

Case Study. Champion Essay CASE: Rebhan v. Pop Warner Little Scholars, INC FACTS: Gator Rebhan is the former head coach of Suniland Sundevils. They were two time National Champions, including a victoy of 56-6 in the championship game. That following week, Pop Warner suspended Rebhan indefinitely alleging he intentionally ran up the score, which is a violation of Pop Warner rules. Rebhan filed a suit claiming that Pop Warner did not follow their own rules, in two instances. First, the referees failed to reward the ball to the opponents after each score until the deficit was less than 36. Rebhan was also never contacted or interviewed by Pop Warner to get his side of the story. ISSUE: Was Pop Warner within its rights to suspend Rebhan for running up the score, without hearing from him first? HOLDING: According to â€Å"We Own This Game†, Gator Rebhan dropped his lawsuit against Pop Warner in the following year. RATIONALE: Although the suit was dropped, Rebhan did hold a very strong case to be reinstated. Pop Warner broke its own league rules by not interviewing him prior to his suspension. Had they done so, they might have come to a different conclusion after he argued that he was trying to protect his own players after the opposing team stacked the box with 11 men. They might also realize that had the officials done their part correctly, Rebhan’s team would never have been rewarded the ball after the deficit reached greater than 36. According to â€Å"We Own This Game†, Rebhan’s suspension expired, and there was no reason for him to follow through with the case. Gator Rebhan was allowed to coach the Suniland Sundevils for the following season.

Fiorello LaGuardia Essay -- New York Mayor Biography Essays

Fiorello LaGuardia Fiorello LaGuardia was born on December 11th 1882 to immigrants of Italian and Jewish ancestry in New York. He served as the mayor of New York City from 1945-1945. He is considered to be one of the mayors who redefined New York City politics. Fiorello had a very long career in politics before serving as mayor. After graduating New York University law school in 1910, LaGuardia practiced law and was appointed Deputy Attorney General. He also served many terms in Congress as a republican. LaGuardia lost his first try at the Mayor’s race to Jimmy Walker in 1929, but was successful on his second try in 1933.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  LaGuardia expressed his interest in the Mayoral running after he lost his final term in Congress, November 1932. On November 22, 1932 LaGuardia invited â€Å"Key men and women in politics and all walks of like to attend an anti-Tammany (present mayor) meeting at town hall† (Mann, P.66). At this meeting, LaGuardia knew that it was too early to talk about candidates. But he did offer a very clear and powerful outline of his beliefs to a reporter for the ‘nation’. He states: â€Å"While everybody is talking about the necessity of a change in our City government, there is nothing really practical, concrete and definite being done. Public opinion must not only be crystallized, but must be translated into action through the medium of an actual fighting organization of determined men and women. The election machinery cannot be over-looked. The best intentions and good will even of a majority of the people cannot, unless properly prepared, overcome th e crookedness, corruption and violence of an entrenched political machine† (Mann, P. 66).   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  After his meeting at Town Hall, LaGuardia returned to Washington to finish his Congressional term, namely his New Deal legislation, leaving many New Yorkers something to think about. He returned to his East Harlem residence on March 4th, 1933. Although LaGuardia was a Republican, and Tammany was a Democrat; he learned that the Fusion party was setting up potential candidates to run against Tammany. LaGuardia saw this as an opportunity to break in to the candidacy. â€Å"The Fusion Conference Committee, as it came to be called, consisted of delegates from groups traditionally hostile to the Wigwam: conservative Republicans, the business community, and the Good Government associations† (Mann, P.67). The fus... .... While there, he introduced his new policy regarding enforcement zones for the officers. Before LaGuardia, the police would enforce where they wanted to enforce. Conveniently ignoring certain areas where organized crime and other criminal activities took place. He recognized this and stated that he will not tolerate it. Along with introducing formal patrol zones, he added 250 more officers to the force.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  LaGuardia not only did well in general but did exceptionally well for the city of New York considering the time period he entered office. Prohibition was just ending, the era of the depression was looming in the air and the city of New York was almost bankrupt. LaGuardia also implemented a large public works plan, and the civil service bureau which brought many jobs and revitalized the economy. However, his plan did include several tax hikes; it brought the cities budget out of deficit.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Still to this day LaGuardia’s work does not go overlooked. He brought New York City to a new level post World War II, and it didn’t faze him one bit. Not only does this prove him to be one of the greatest mayors New York has ever had, but one of the greatest leaders of all time.

Class and Gender Reflection

A reflection on Class and Gender from a traditional / ethnic background by: Gender: I grew up surrounded by powerful women: Three older sisters who decided what I would wear and which games we would play. A mother and two aunties, who held positions of power as teachers. My dad was a passive person and therefore was ruled by the women in our household. So at my young age, â€Å"Gender† was protection for my dad' My first exposure to gender outside of my household was In the media. With the feminist movement. I then realized that my home was an exception and that globally, omen were being treated as If they were Inferior to men.But another realization came to me: In the western world, women were fighting for independence, whereas in traditional societies, women were (and are still) fighting for family unity. A priest once told me: The woman Is the pillar of her household. In the ass in Mauritius, the feminist movement started with the boom In the economy. Suddenly, housewives w ent to work In mass In factories and this caused a significant change in the family dynamics in two ways: No longer were men the sole bread winners in the family; and Ђ Children were coming home from school without a parent being horn.With regards to Africa, a significant component of humanitarian aid has gone towards the empowerment of African women, like helping them to build Income generating activities. However, no work has been done in parallel with the men. So men of traditional societies suddenly found themselves less educated than their wives, and becoming reliant on their wives for Income support. This loss In status without any opportunity to express themselves, have caused some men to turn violent towards heir wives. More and more now. Unitarian agencies are making sure that all community members participate in the process of project to ensure that the men are not left â€Å"behind-. Class: Growing up, It was clear that there was (and that there still Is) a social cl ass system In Mauritius, even It It was not openly acknowledged. There Is clear delve In terms of 1) wealth, 2) education, 3) skin color and even 4) your name. And this class structure Is maintained by the political and economic system, because they benefit trot it. Politicians can more easily pull the wool over the eyes tooth population, it the latter is uneducated.In Australia, it seemed that there was no class division in society – I now know that this Is not true. Twelve years ago, I moved back to Mauritius and chose to live in a small coastal village where the majority of the people are poor. My city friends could not relate to my new friends from the village. There were many differences between the two groups: education, beliefs, methods of worship, standard of living, health and hygiene (amongst many others) and neither group could openly and clearly monomaniac with each other and therefore would struggle to understand the actions of the other.People from a different s ocial class have a different culture: they have a different way of looking at things. For example, Cambodia like eating grilled cockroaches, while we Mauritania make it our purpose to exterminate them. And this reminds me of one of my favorite quote – â€Å"El respect De la difference De latter est.  ¤ la base De lanthanum ©Ã¢â‚¬  – which literally translate to – respect for the difference in others is at the core of our humanity.

Federalist No. 10 And No Essay - 1454 Words

Federalist No. 10 and No. 51, essays are Madison’s arguments about the fictions provides details about the cause, effect, and solutions to deal with factions. The two Federalist essays, which are highly regarded today, are the numbers 10 and 51. In these essays. Madison explained that in a large state a variety of factions and interests could terminate one another out and it makes it tough for any single faction to create a majority and hijack the government for its interests. Arguing and lobbying for the ratification of the United States Constitution, the Federalist essays are a series of essays initiated by Alexander Hamilton. However, the Federalist Number 10 and 51 is James Madison’s essays, but he was initially invited by Hamilton to co-author these. Published on November 1787 Federalist Number 10 is among the most highly regarded American political writings. According to the essay, factions means an adverse act of some people, a group of individuals or groups of citizens, who are inspired by some common passions towards the rights of other citizens. The essay is mainly discussing the issue of factions and ways to deal with it. In the Federalist number 10, Madison argued and analyzed the importance of the Constitution that can support the establishment of a government capable of controlling the violence and damage caused by factions. The essay proposes that the state administrations have not accomplished in resolving factions, but the situation is so challengingShow MoreRelatedThe Federalist # 10 : Analysis1494 Words   |  6 PagesThe Federalist #10 I. Background Information The Federalist Papers are a series of 85 essays arguing in support of the United States Constitution. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay were the authors who wrote these pieces and the three men wrote under the name of Publius (who was instrumental in the founding of the Roman democracy) instead of signing individual works. They all attended the Constitutional Convention, in fact, Alexander Hamilton and James Madison were the main ones whoRead More Federalist 10 Essay713 Words   |  3 PagesFederalist 10 Liberty. This word means many things to many people. There is no way to distinctly define the term without leaving someones crucial point of view out of the equation. One person might say that anarchy would be the only way to have complete and utter freedom, while others would go as far as to believe a controlled communist government is the best route to achieving liberation. Factions (a group of people who agree on certain topics) are inevitable, due to the nature of manRead MoreFederalist 10 Paper1593 Words   |  7 PagesFEDERALIST #10 This paper is considered an important document in American history for it lays out how the writers of the constitution defined the form of government that would protect minority rights from organized and united factions that intended to pass legislation injurious to the liberty of the minority or detrimental to the good of the country. The Federalist Papers, were a series of eighty five essays written by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison between October 1787 andRead MoreFederalist #10 Essay860 Words   |  4 PagesIn â€Å"Federalist #10†, Madison describes the dangerous effects that factions can have on Republican government and on its people. Madison defines a faction as a group of citizens who unite under a shared cause, and work against other groups in order to achieve their means. Their means of achieving their goals may achieve adverse effects upon the rights of other citizens. Put in more modern terms, a faction could be reasonably compared to a special-interest group. The sort of faction that most endangersRead MoreThe Federalist 10, By James Madison858 Words   |  4 PagesIn the Federalist 10, it is mostly about the constitution. It was written by James Madison, who oversaw it. The main purpose of this article is faction. In politics, faction is people that group themselves. Mad ison said that in the republic. Madison says that the number one common characteristic is the largest people. The democracy would be possible because you couldn’t create a majority group of people that would have a lot in common. However now, democracy become too big in this scale. People don’tRead MoreFederalist Papers #10 Essay1425 Words   |  6 PagesUnited we stand, divided we fall The Federalist Papers Number 10 is written by James Madison and explains the necessity of the Constitution to protect our country from factions. A faction is â€Å"a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent aggregate interests of the community (Publius, 72).† Publius states that there are two waysRead MoreEssay on Federalist 10 Summary2213 Words   |  9 PagesSummary  Ã‚  Analysis  of  Federalist  #10      Summary:   Madison  begins  perhaps  the  most  famous  of  the  Federalist  papers  by  stating  that  one  of  the   strongest  arguments  in  favor  of  the  Constitution  is  the  fact  that  it  establishes  a  government   capable  of  controlling  the  violence  and  damage  caused  by  factions.  Madison  defines  that   factions  are  groups  of  people  who  gather  together  to  protect  and  promote  their  special   economic  interests  and  political  opinions.  Although  these  factions  are  at  odds  with  each  otherRead MoreAnalysis Of Federalist 10 By James Madison1525 Words   |  7 PagesIn Federalist 10 by James Madison, he addresses key issues like factions and democracy, all while focusing on the usefulness of the Constitution and the necessity of a strong central government, to defend his Federalist ideology. Personally, I agree with the foundation of his arguments, especially on the topic of forms of government, as well as the role of representation in our government. Madison’s primary focus throughout the beginning of this paper is factions. He holds a deep disdain for themRead MoreAnalysis Of The Article Federalist 10 And 51 Essay2208 Words   |  9 PagesQuestion 2 As a response to angry and frustrated citizens at the fact that nothing had been in President Barack Obama’s first two years in office, James Madison, author of Federalist 10 and 51, would argue that the government was created by the Framers to be virtually unable to get anything done, and if he had gotten anything done, the government was not working correctly. A president is not the supreme leader of a country, therefore the Constitution designs a system separation of powers and theRead MoreThe Dangers of Factions Explained in James Madisons The Federalist No. 10 528 Words   |  3 PagesJames Madison wrote The Federalist No. 10 to inform the people about the problems and possible solutions for the formation of factions. Through multiple statements concerning the dangers of factions and the benefits of a republic, Madison’s major argument was in favor of the United States Constitution. Madison defined a faction as A number of citizens, whether amounting to a minorit y or majority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion or interest, adverse to the